Blog & Articles

5 Sales and Marketing Alignment Challenges and Fixes

Written by Iain Wicks | Sep 30, 2026, 1:50:31 PM

Sales and marketing alignment matters most at the points where one team's work becomes the other's responsibility. A contact qualifies for a conversation, an account starts showing interest, or a deal reaches a stage where both teams need to contribute. If the teams use different definitions or incomplete data, those moments become harder to manage.

Here are five common challenges, with practical ways to address each one.

1. Unclear marketing-to-sales handoffs

A handoff can fail before anyone receives a notification. If marketing and sales disagree about what makes a contact ready for sales, even a perfectly timed alert sends the wrong person to the wrong next step. The mechanism also matters: who owns the contact, where does the alert arrive, and what context travels with it?

Agree on criteria and ownership

Bring marketing and sales operations together to define lifecycle stages and the evidence required to move between them. Consider engagement, fit with your ideal customer profile, buying role and account context. Some products or customer segments may need different thresholds.

Review recent won opportunities to see when sales became involved, then document the handoff point, record owner and follow-up expectation. Configure your CRM and automation around that agreement, rather than letting a workflow define the process by accident. Revisit the criteria when the quality of handoffs changes.

2. Disconnected systems

When marketing activity, contact records and sales opportunities sit in separate tools, each team sees a different account history. Missing or delayed updates can affect qualification, reporting and follow-up. Adding another integration will not help if nobody has agreed which system holds the authoritative value.

Map the data before changing the tools

List the systems used across the customer journey and trace a contact from first engagement to opportunity. Note where information is entered manually, copied, delayed or lost. Decide which fields need to move between systems and who owns each definition.

Consolidating suitable processes in a shared CRM may reduce handoffs between tools. Where separate systems remain necessary, test their integrations against real records and check what happens when a value changes in either direction. A connected stack still needs clear ownership and regular checks.

3. Inconsistent customer data

Missing buying roles, inconsistent company names and stale contact details can distort both campaigns and sales decisions. A segment built on incomplete fields misses relevant people; a sales rep who cannot see recent engagement has less context for a useful conversation.

Make the important fields easier to maintain

Ask the people entering data where the process slows them down. Put frequently used properties where they can find them, use consistent choices where appropriate and document what each field means. Focus first on the information needed for routing, segmentation and reporting.

Use automation for predictable updates, such as assigning ownership or creating follow-up tasks when agreed criteria are met. Review exceptions and missing values regularly. Automation can reduce manual work, but it will also repeat a bad rule consistently, so check the underlying definitions first.

4. Goals that reward different outcomes

If marketing is assessed mainly on the number of qualified contacts while sales is assessed on opportunities and revenue, both teams can meet their own targets while disagreeing about lead quality. Content engagement can signal interest, but it does not always mean someone is ready for a sales conversation.

Review progression together

Hold a regular joint review of the contacts marketing passed to sales, the conversations that followed and the opportunities that progressed. Discuss recurring objections, content mentioned in calls and accounts that became customers. Use that evidence to refine qualification and decide when educational content should remain ungated or when sales should become involved.

Keep team-specific measures where useful, but add shared measures for progression and pipeline quality. Agree on the definitions behind those measures so that the review becomes a decision-making session rather than a debate over whose numbers are right.

5. Account-based marketing without account-level coordination

Account-based marketing (ABM) asks sales and marketing to work with several people involved in a purchase, not just one contact. That makes every earlier challenge more visible. A single contact may appear engaged while the decision-maker or another important stakeholder has not been reached.

Map the buying committee and coordinate next steps

Look at recent closed deals to identify the buying roles that commonly participated and who appeared first. Record known roles on your target accounts, while allowing for gaps and exceptions. Then agree which accounts to prioritise, what each stakeholder needs to understand, and who is responsible for each conversation or piece of content.

Review engagement at the account level alongside sales activity. A shared view can reveal where marketing and sales are contacting the same person repeatedly, or where a key stakeholder still needs attention. Start with a manageable set of accounts before trying to scale the approach.

Where to start

Choose the handoff or data gap that causes the most friction today. Document the current process, agree a shared definition, and test it against real opportunities. Once both teams trust that first decision, update the systems, reporting and account plan around it. Alignment becomes easier to maintain when responsibilities and evidence are visible to everyone involved.

Stonehouse Communications offers HubSpot CRM services to help teams connect their processes and data. If you need help reviewing your handoffs or CRM setup, start with a conversation about the specific point where your teams lose context.